Nuclear has fewer accidents than other power generation technologies, but then, it's not like you need all that many to fuck shit up.
hmm--is this just easier to measure (because concentrated) than the reportedly-larger radiation emissions from coal combustion?
-
-
and really seems odd that this wouldn't be contained at the site barring disaster, I guess I'm skeptical but persuadable of course!
-
Coal is also shitty and causes more widespread pollution overall, but if a coal plant goes sideways you can live there sooner than 10000yrs.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.