Does a P value of less than 5% necessarily mean that the hypothesis of the researcher is wrong?
-
-
Effect size is way underrated, I think, at least in psych studies.
-
That sounds right--outside of my bailiwick, I don't get an opinion here. :) But generally study design, effect size, reproduction > t tests
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed. Depends on your priors. If you've tested twenty things, one may have p<.05 just by random chance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.