More thinking about HWNDU. Wrecking someone's art usually anathema to me, why do I find it acceptable-to-hilarious in this case?
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
Occurred to me that the original premise of the project centered around engagement by the public; holding up a mirror (camera) to the people
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
This is a cool idea, but problem for LeBouef is he lives in a world where a lot of people disagree with him, + they'll take the stage too
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
So you had pro Trump people and also trolls showing up. And immediately the artist betrays his art because he doesn't like its revelation!
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
Another way of saying this is that the problem for LeBouef is that HWNDU is **Popperian** art. The premise is a risky prediction!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eigenrobot
In the sense that LeBouef imagined it to be true, HWNDU was falsified. Pretending that's not the case betrays the premise. . . . I think.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
A (related?) idea, semi-via
@Shipoclu: LeBouef fucked up by trying to control how others viewed and interpreted his art. He invited public \1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
participation and interest, then tried to control that participation with post hoc demands. "You may not use my art and ideas that way!"
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
In this way maybe you can view anti-HWNDU antics as the subversion of LeBouef's attempts at artistic authoritarianism. Which seems good.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.