More thinking about HWNDU. Wrecking someone's art usually anathema to me, why do I find it acceptable-to-hilarious in this case?
-
-
Another way of saying this is that the problem for LeBouef is that HWNDU is **Popperian** art. The premise is a risky prediction!
-
In the sense that LeBouef imagined it to be true, HWNDU was falsified. Pretending that's not the case betrays the premise. . . . I think.
-
A (related?) idea, semi-via
@Shipoclu: LeBouef fucked up by trying to control how others viewed and interpreted his art. He invited public \ -
participation and interest, then tried to control that participation with post hoc demands. "You may not use my art and ideas that way!"
-
In this way maybe you can view anti-HWNDU antics as the subversion of LeBouef's attempts at artistic authoritarianism. Which seems good.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
imagine if John Cage stormed out of 4'33 when someone talked
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.