yeah something like this might be inevitable w/ sufficient automation + democracy maybe? glad people are thinking about it
big picture, probably changing institutions is key to --> welfare at scale, evolution in market context seems to work best
-
-
I'm not sure how biodt. fits in here--seems like that idea mostly contradicts certain claims of wealth accruing to deserving?
-
yeah, Bell Curve inb4 the left going full Rawls with their info, but they got ULTRAM4D at denial of maleability instead
-
not just personal (I think I can only be prideful of things I've achieved, so that means NOTHING at this point in my life) but…
-
-
person that worked their asses/took risks dif to 1 that didn't? sure.In % of 'expl. variance'still much smaller than ppl think
-
and people equal in all the "deservingness" or "self-attained" stuff still varying a lot in social, economic outcomes etc.
-
maybe trick is decoupling 'generates desert' from 'something we want to incentivize'?
-
this seems strict correct but now I'm doubting myself, maybe people don't respond well to incentives w/o moralism
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.