Maybe get a few tons of excess grain and let some bunch of thousands try it out just in case famines are that deterministic
development econ looks at lots of interventions, mostly they fail long-term; institutional context has much to do with this
-
-
big picture, probably changing institutions is key to --> welfare at scale, evolution in market context seems to work best
-
I'm not sure how biodt. fits in here--seems like that idea mostly contradicts certain claims of wealth accruing to deserving?
-
yeah, Bell Curve inb4 the left going full Rawls with their info, but they got ULTRAM4D at denial of maleability instead
-
not just personal (I think I can only be prideful of things I've achieved, so that means NOTHING at this point in my life) but…
-
-
person that worked their asses/took risks dif to 1 that didn't? sure.In % of 'expl. variance'still much smaller than ppl think
-
and people equal in all the "deservingness" or "self-attained" stuff still varying a lot in social, economic outcomes etc.
-
maybe trick is decoupling 'generates desert' from 'something we want to incentivize'?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
definition of work varies.interventions that try 2 change robust traits,yeah.not having people live in damn misery lower ceiling
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.