it's workers owning means of production,so literally communism but yeah guess it's not even marxismleninism used pseudo for that
thinking it through at a high level--haven't in a while--I think I'm maybe an institutional conservative w.r.t. welfare? like
-
-
development econ looks at lots of interventions, mostly they fail long-term; institutional context has much to do with this
-
big picture, probably changing institutions is key to --> welfare at scale, evolution in market context seems to work best
-
I'm not sure how biodt. fits in here--seems like that idea mostly contradicts certain claims of wealth accruing to deserving?
-
yeah, Bell Curve inb4 the left going full Rawls with their info, but they got ULTRAM4D at denial of maleability instead
-
not just personal (I think I can only be prideful of things I've achieved, so that means NOTHING at this point in my life) but…
-
-
person that worked their asses/took risks dif to 1 that didn't? sure.In % of 'expl. variance'still much smaller than ppl think
-
and people equal in all the "deservingness" or "self-attained" stuff still varying a lot in social, economic outcomes etc.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.