this (at a high level at least) seems way more realistic than past iterations weird to still call it communism tho (?)
interesting, I hadn't thought of the effect of biodeterminism. unsure if it changes things for me--need to mull that a bit
-
-
thinking it through at a high level--haven't in a while--I think I'm maybe an institutional conservative w.r.t. welfare? like
-
development econ looks at lots of interventions, mostly they fail long-term; institutional context has much to do with this
-
big picture, probably changing institutions is key to --> welfare at scale, evolution in market context seems to work best
-
I'm not sure how biodt. fits in here--seems like that idea mostly contradicts certain claims of wealth accruing to deserving?
-
yeah, Bell Curve inb4 the left going full Rawls with their info, but they got ULTRAM4D at denial of maleability instead
-
not just personal (I think I can only be prideful of things I've achieved, so that means NOTHING at this point in my life) but…
-
-
person that worked their asses/took risks dif to 1 that didn't? sure.In % of 'expl. variance'still much smaller than ppl think
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
was already kinda there, but if you remember the explosion of the mentions with Scott's parable of talents, that also helped
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.