okay! so I don't have substantial thoughts on the second point and you shouldn't haveve trust me if I did, BUT the paper is solid
2. Even better, the authors are thoughtful about the sorts of 'spillovers' that might screw up the validity of their analysis.
-
-
3. The fact that their analysis shows tippelzones seem to cause decreases in sexual assaults, but not drug crimes, leads me . . .
-
to trust their results even more; as do the size of the results. And their model fits unusually well for social science.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.