. . . seems like room for gender and science politics to get both more unsettled and more explosive in novel ways
-
-
-
Or maybe we just don't talk about it as usual, that's probably more likely. All hail differencing-oriented identification strategies I guess
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
why is that a thing that you would even try to measure?
-
I have no idea. I guess if you're a psychometrician and curious about trans populations more generally, might be useful?
-
but holy sample bias, batman
-
yeah I'd be shocked if the ~+2SD finding held up in a broader sample
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
oooh, this is the first I'm hearing of this paper but I'm the opposite of surprised
-
yeah same :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
wait I missed this paper!!
-
It's a ways down here (search 127.9)--haven't actually read the study so can't endorse but I like the idea :D https://sillyolme.wordpress.com/faq-on-the-science/ …
-
that whole piece was fascinating to read. I buy the resources explanation for the IQ effect too
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.