Brink Lindsey on current politics. Reminiscient of Kuhnian distinction between revolutionary and normal science http://bloggingheads.tv/videos/45225?in=15:35&out=32:47 …
HA. It's always him or Popper Am I mischaracterizing or mis-(analogizing?) Kuhn (1962)? It's been 13 years since I read it.
-
-
revolutionary science produces a new framework that work gets done in & I think if anything current politics is a vacuum
-
it's an empirical result that challenges the prevailing theory but it isn't a new theory
-
that's about what I intended. there was some sort of old framework; it's been smashed and and we're fighting over new one's form
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.