there was a ranging and I think good tweetstorm on this last night from @olivertraldi https://twitter.com/olivertraldi/status/834303267064647681 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
it's good but more on current politics of debate (I'll check if the philosophy thing is right with a pal :P)
@AndrewSabisky1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes
I'm mostly confused because on 'narrow free speech' I'm what
@AndrewSabisky has called an 'autistic less wrong type'...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes @AndrewSabisky
because anything goes, but I'm puzzled when I hear getting disintivited at uni goes against 'free speech'
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes @AndrewSabisky
or deleting a blog comment. as long as you can publish it elsewhere and link it, I don't call it censorship
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes @AndrewSabisky
yeah I think I could articulate a set of principles about what I'd consider censorship if pressed, but what's
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
maybe more important to me is "what framework of social punishment for expression ---> best epistemology"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
think what I'm trying to say is seems most useful to discuss free speech as an instrument, not deontologically
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @AndrewSabisky
I just view it as tit-tat. Censoring speech you dislike so tempting only way to avoid precedent that may...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes @AndrewSabisky
later be used against your speech is just not letting people ban speech
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I think that also works :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.