3. mccain and similar don't gaf because they don't need those voters and left will support undermining trump regardless. no effect.
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
anyway it seems like bad form on the left to burn potential allies to ingroup signal otoh this is the story of the contemporary left so
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
Leftism is defined by opposition to capitalism. I'm unclear on how McCain is a potential ally to that
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyDWarfield
Or what an 'ally' against capitalism could even mean
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyDWarfield
HUH. do you mind if I ask what you make of this? http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2015/10/my_simplistic_t.html … obviously pro-market writer, but is story ~correct?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eigenrobot @EmilyDWarfield
other question: is opposition to capitalism sole objective of left, or are any other ends seen as desirable?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @EmilyDWarfield
seems like trump in many ways more anti-market (eg, on trade) than establishment, should garner left support in this model?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
Fascism isn't 'anti-market', it's the logical endpoint of capitalism
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyDWarfield
I think I mostly follow; may I ask how you're defining "capitalism" in particular? Private ownership of firms, or . . . ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
I'm using a Marxist definition (which FTR is pretty widely accepted among economists, even proponents of capitalism)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
ok, I think I understand where you're coming from. thank you! I appreciate the perspective :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.