Seems right. ∃ some set of parameters where I would want a deep state to undermine an elected President, institutionally costly as it'd be.https://twitter.com/emusdrinking/status/832411311065747456 …
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
Set of parameters in which they would, regardless of what you or I might want.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emusdrinking
yeah, in either direction too. my RT comment (+this one) kind of tangential but something I've been thinking about
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @eigenrobot
These are: 1) People sworn to defend the US Contitution 2) People with > skills in destabilizing states than running them.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emusdrinking
If called upon to run the US, CIA would turn to DoD and be like, "You got this, right?"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emusdrinking
and I imagine DoD would try to pass things on authority ASAP too, apart from maintaining some kind of basic stability?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
no that I'd want to rely on that, but they don't seem into running countries either, esp after the last decade
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.