seems like impulse control not major factor in school evaluation + selection? anyway people make bad choices -/-> more choices will hurt thmhttps://twitter.com/ModeledBehavior/status/829762906933837824 …
-
-
& really all i mean is students whose parents can't afford any other option even w/ subsidy/voucher.
-
do you think a low-cost option wouldn't emerge? I'm a bit more worried about the peer effects for low-income cohorts :/
-
I didn't mean lemons market would unravel completely since it's public
-
depending on nature of peer effects sorting might be an improvement on status quo, tho bleak. eg, if there's a threshhold effect...
-
where past some very low fraction of bad students learning falls off cliff, might be better to concentrate those students together
-
or even more dramatically just have finely graded course difficulty w/all students close in ability, and push hard
-
I mean right now seems edu efficiency is hard-limited by high variance in student ability and (in primary, secondary) maturity
-
ah so many thoughts! 1 is pub schools (in many places) already so well sorted on parental income prob wouldn't change much
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I mean students. It's not offense if you couch it in econ-jargon.
-
"it's not offensive if you couch it in our jargon" should be our discipline's motto. seriously I think it's how we get by
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.