"'"Event X will be exploited by Group A," said Group B, also exploiting it' said Group A, also exploiting it" said Group B, also...
-
-
Depends on the event :) But then you have iterations on prior events, plus new supposedly related events...
-
And then someone new shoulders the interpretation, and this seems to be perceived as a new version, almost.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There might also be different interests who don't agree with either group directly. Exploitation all around.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But I guess what you're getting at is the core event. Maybe it's more genuine to suggest event-sub-prime, etc? I dunno.
-
:) somewhere there was a discussion of radar (detector)**4 & a postulate that recursion usually stopped at 3 levels (1/2)
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.