...or weaker libel and slander laws, and tougher lawsuit provisions...
-
-
Replying to @tylercowen
would stop potential abuses of regulatory state.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
but I buy that argument, not zero regulatory capacity!
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tylercowen
lies in fact that it is effectively impossible to remove risk of abuse of pres. discretion via a technical/bureaucratic fix.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
cultural change is part of the fix, quality of govt. and chance of abuse varies enormously across jurisdictions...
10 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tylercowen
but my point is that just the same critique can be made of libertarian “mood affiliation” against critiques of inequality.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
That said, I don't doubt the wealthy always will get "better justice" but still I think we should have billionaires.
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tylercowen
vocabulary that directly accounts for power of wealthy rather than pushing it to one side as not relevant to inquiry.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @henryfarrell
maybe Hulk has a moral right to sue them. No consent on tape. Innovation is that he won't settle, justice rather than $$?
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tylercowen
How are Hogan’s motivations relevant here? Unless Thiel is supporting him purely because of his disinterested belief in …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
maybe Thiel's motivations aren't relevant either...?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.