I think @st_rev said that if you take it seriously, you conclude that everyone is uniquely and fractally embedded in >
-
-
Well… it probably depends on what you are trying to accomplish… some generalizations hold statistically,
-
but if you are trying to understand what’s happening in a particular case, that might not help
-
semi-hot take: maybe try to keep 'science' on general cases, and pass subjective + idiosyncratic to artists?
-
sounds right. I guess
@sarahdoingthing ’s original question = whether science is possible here -
I think when some objectivity is allowed it's feasible. Eg, causal-oriented studies on discrim. in econ lit
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.