1. Stray thought: "easy" way to get a back-of-the-envelope upper bound on trafficking. First get # actual trafficking victims found in OCC
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
2. ... along with total # arrests / interviews of sex workers. Next, assume these were targeted at ads w/highest prob of trafficking
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
3. Finally, multiple trafficked/total by some measure of total individuals represented in ads on a given day. Reasonable upper bound?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
4. Has the advantage of relying on sampling from a population and not just assuming jailed people under pressure giving accurate info.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
5. Downside is it relies on OCC data which is probably not so good, but again: upper bound. And if you look at
@emikoyama's data ...1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
6. You get something like a 1:10 (high variance) trafficking:total ratio for SW arrests in samples from the biased population.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.