@GrantLeeStone nope my knowledge comes from peer reviewed content analysis
@LMickelwait This is an ok descriptive study, but I don't see how you can get to "therefore ban porn" without a longer chain of logic. Yes?
-
-
@aspasia_project therefore my position is one of abolition by reducing demand and helping women exit.
-
@LMickelwait I won't argue with your priors; but how do your beliefs accommodate women who don't want to exit? -
@aspasia_project its historical fact there were slaves that didn't want emancipation. Were we wrong to abolish the institution of slavery?
-
1.
@LMickelwait define a thing called UL as the relationship of slaves to their owners abstracting from institutions enforcing slavery -
2.
@LMickelwait and spose those institutions prevent slaves from choosing another way of life, denoted OL. Allow some slaves prefer UL to OL -
3
@LMickelwait abolishing institutions *forcing* UL, but still permitting UL, makes everyone weakly better-off. This is a Pareto improvement -
4.
@LMickelwait as a matter of policy, *forcing* OL on everyone is unambiguously worse than the policy described in (3) above. -
@aspasia_project internationally agreed upon that reducing demand reduces sex trafficking & commercial sexual exploitation thus Nordic model
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@aspasia_project I see com. sex industry including cyber prostitution as inherently exploitative a form of violence against women.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.