prob regret this, but how is it that KR was justified in using deadly force against an unarmed man bc he claims to have feared for his life, yet no one else in the area was justified in using force or attempting to disarm KR on the same grounds after watching him kill someone?
-
-
my guess and it is probably wrong us that you could shoot him if he were actively shooting. but if he had holstered his gun and was running away with his hands in the air probably claiming self defense or defense of others would be very difficult
-
you probably want to pitch these to an actual lawyer--self defense law seems very particular and varies from state to state common components include requirements that another has the (1) means, (2) intent, and (3) opportunity to hurt you but then there are a billion other bits
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.