yes and no
1. the stone age was an age of the generalist although even there specialists existed
2. @visakanv claimed probably <1% can really read or write, yes and no but also yes
3. lots of people can manipulate software. your doing it nowhttps://twitter.com/amasad/status/1460030128616927234 …
-
-
the future belongs to coders. this has been clear since the 90s and only grows truer as time passes. our current struggles pitch the old priesthood against the new but the end is not in doubt. this is historic dialectical if you want to be marxist about it. it is inexorable
Show this thread -
now is the time of monstershttps://twitter.com/eigenrobot/status/1449906993519464450?t=TGmHv36soG3q9p4Ia2WRcw&s=19 …
Show this thread -
we'll always have clever knaves and ruthless killers at the top but their actions will be constrained and shaped by the tools of the priestshttps://twitter.com/OfKimbriki/status/1460215981830066177?t=-vL8RWWtTeGQ_86cNUzEyw&s=19 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“whether one finds this intriguing or frightening” ha just saw some thread recently freaking out about ConstitutionDAO because if a buncha randos can come together to flash mob a purchase of an expensive thing, what else could people do? Imagination is the bottleneck
-
this ties back nicely to our long-running conversation about how nobody is prepared for the inconceivable future
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What coding can do is so potent I'm consistently shocked most academic profession's reaction to it is just "meh this is interesting." I guess it shouldn't be surprising given we see the printing press today with no consideration it was the advent of mass propaganda.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.