cant believe im linking a WSJ editorial but here we arehttps://twitter.com/eigenrobot/status/1451183298546257924?t=qWosWZMKFRrYSVcH58HpkQ&s=19 …
-
-
Show this thread
-
subthread, another case on the pile governments will literally ruin things rather than implementing efficient pigouvian tax systems and letting markets figure it out like independent on whether policy aim is desirable you want it implemented like thathttps://twitter.com/TheSuppressed86/status/1451188925091835905?t=aQ5yaDsOfdtcJauuiVLdbA&s=19 …
Show this thread -
like ha ha ha why let water prices reflect the cost of water when you could force everyone to have shitty shower heads and toilets that dont flush and no option to just pay more ha ha ha if its yellow let it mellow dude ha ha love excrement to chill in my house lol. lmao
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
so this is a happy story right? Everybody wins! The president, (climate friendly funds OK) and the fund companies (higher fees) That's everybody, right?

-
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep, deciding what's for dinner"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
i'm shocked, shocked. all those environmental and ethical index funds are such a sham.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
An eighth of a percent for a passive? My mutual funds charge less than a sixth of that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.