Random thought that's popped up lately for me: does it make sense to use DAOs as a platform to fund open scientific study where the questions, methods, review, and results could be handled in a consistent way and in the same manner as open source software?
-
Show this thread
-
Is anyone doing this or trying to get something like this off the ground? Full transparency, community review, open discussion, votes on proposals, votes on who will conduct the research, and full submission of results for anyone to review (and possibly score)
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
I don't know enough about academic research to understand if this would be preferable to the current system or result in better research but I'm curious
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
One benefit seems like it would make research actually open and create transparency around funding and selection mechanisms for the public
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
@eigenrobot@lisatomic5@halvorz would be curious to hear your thoughts on this3 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
the file-drawers are full of papers with ideas to increase the efficiency and openness of the academy -- mustapha mond
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @liminal_warmth and
you might have a shot at getting it adopted if you could convince administrators it would subtantially increase funding for their initiatives, giving them control of larger budgets. otherwise DOA
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Why not work outside of the academy altogether?
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
-
-
what i have learned from my friends in the private sector is that i do not want to work in the private sector
0 replies 0 retweets 8 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.