That’s the funny thing about pomo-adjacent epistemes: they can’t explain themselves in anything but their own terms: Standpoint theory is only from their point of view. All of their claims are just language power games. Etc
-
-
-
fancy term is “homoiconic” or not. Ie can you describe a system in that system alone.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
this is a wonderful thing to have learned, ty
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you robot are rhetoric
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
its up to yuo of course
End of conversation
-
-
-
A subtype of ad-hom
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Imagine writing this and not thinking we should extend the same privilege to everyone, but that we should take it away from everyone equally.https://twitter.com/drvolts/status/1433888290222972933?s=19 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bulverism is my second-favorite fallacy because it has the coolest sounding name behind the "Motte-And-Bailey Fallacy"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.