i mean... i think i disagree (esp. with afghanistan as a control group) but regardless, i also disagree that abortion is the interesting thing about this casehttps://twitter.com/humanisque/status/1433281630655991808 …
-
-
Replying to @humanisque
oh sure who knows tho. im somewhat more sanguine about this because its removing a constraint on states rather than imposing one, and because after Wickard everything is calvinball anyway
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
hm i think characterizing everything as either "calvinball" or "not calvinball" is pretty black and white -- esp in relation to a bad 1942 ruling and esp in the context of our current political environment
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @humanisque
how would you characterize our political environment?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
i think its bad in the standard ways ppl think it's bad probably -- general increases partisanship/radicalism, moloch-y collapse of good politics. Also vague left-leaning concerns about voting rights i don't about much
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @humanisque
I see. was just trying to figure out what about the context seemed salient, this is a fairly high dimensional space :) I guess at this current point I could imagine a hypothetical court ruling in any direction on any issue likely to come before it, contingent on . . .
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @humanisque
. . . the political context outside the court. I would have said this before tonight, I don't think I've updated my priors much. I also don't really have strong views of abortion and while I don't mind when people do that territory seems really over-explored
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot @humanisque
So I guess what's left is, is this approach to end runs around enforcement generalizable and effective, and what are the long term impacts of that if so this seems interesting and probably important but it seems very hard to predict. at least for me.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
yeah, that question is why im particularly concerned about this political context. The potential to enforce a wide swathe of laws regardless of constitutionality is a very big weapon in the context of a race-to-the-bottom situation balkanization acceleration and such
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @humanisque @eigenrobot
i do not think this is a good right to leave to the states bc mostly bc it changes the political situation from "supreme court may play calvinball every so often based on political context" to "every state constantly plays calvinball" and the constitution is Good Actually
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
I think we're value aligned on this, I think im more whitepilled tho a RETVRN to eg the tenth amendment leave a lot of flexibility available. id be fine with more social policy being set locally. prefer it even.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.