long good thread arguing for a chemical origin of mass obesityhttps://twitter.com/mold_time/status/1412827749828513800 …
-
-
mostly im just glad someone is doing a big survey of it after
@karlbykarlsmith's work from some years backShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
People like this like to imagine that the body can just conjure up energy out of thin air rather than burn fat stores.
End of conversation
-
-
-
*If* the trend is truly this stark over time, it should be monocausal.https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/YgbJq4WrZWXe5GvFY/multiple-factor-explanations-should-not-appear-one-sided …
-
maybe would you say the same about the industrial revolution?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Lotta text about consumption and very little about expenditure. Reads as a guy going really far out of his way to justify not exercising.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Number of causes would depend on the level of analysis, no? The trend is clear enough and exceptions patterned enough that there almost has to be a convergence point upstream of where most people are looking.
-
A combination of homeostasis disruption through modernity and something like "honing the body as a fine-tuned instrument" as a condition for reestablishing homeostasis? That would catch fat zoo animals, fit athletes and the odd individual who seems mysteriously unaffected.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It is delayed by different amounts in NEA countries Perhaps something can be flogged out of that
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
and
follow similar trajectories and are pretty close for men.