im vaccinated and i would really prefer everyone choose to be vaccinated but i dont spend time talking about this for a few reasons. this first is that i dont actually think it would have the desired effect if i just yelled at people about it. relatedly this feels tendentious.
-
Show this thread
-
the third is that the people who are really vocally not just provaccine but coercive about it have a serious missing mood about their stancehttps://www.econlib.org/archives/2016/01/the_invisible_t.html …
7 replies 3 retweets 163 likesShow this thread -
if your position is "having everyone vaccinated is incredibly important, so much so (for various reasons) that we should accept the very real and serious short- and long-term civil costs of coercing people to get a vaccine" i actually respect that thought i dont necessarily agree
8 replies 1 retweet 155 likesShow this thread -
the pro-coercion position that i actually tend to see is more like thispic.twitter.com/gCWo2k7cAl
22 replies 9 retweets 181 likesShow this thread -
your read may differ, but he seems to be downright /eager/ to use coercive means to attain a public health end, and specifically trying to do some kind of internet-tough guy-but-bureaucratic-for-some-reason framing to attack people who disagree with him
7 replies 6 retweets 221 likesShow this thread -
as someone who cares about public health but is also wary of coercion as a tool this makes me less inclined to ever support coercive means for public health ends, because it reminds me that people like him will be the ones designing and executing the coercive policies from DC
6 replies 5 retweets 225 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @eigenrobot
if you want to tweak him, ask him to explain the origin of the term, “in statu confessionis”
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I think ive done enough. heh gonna google this though
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.