well the past is what it is; all of the reasoning is counterfactual; every counterfactual necessarily involves an ahistorical assumption but people were mad at lyman's proposal *in real time*
-
-
I do not understand how this is supposed to be a response, sorry.
-
I know
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
a 0% authoritarian policy would have had mass production of vaccines up by that summer
-
The context of this was not a battle in which, if Lyman won, the FDA is enshrined for another century, while if Lyman loses, the FDA disappears.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.