thinking about it more i am pretty sure the answer is no
-
-
-
-
its fun thinking about legal problems out loud having never studied law, and then finding out where youve erred from people who havehttps://twitter.com/asglidden/status/1422440373587087362?s=19 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the answer to strict liability is almost always no
-
yeah get some absolute liability up here
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I imagine this like car insurance, where you pay a monthly premium, then if you catch a contagious disease, you get a payout from the other people's insurance.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Im not confident enough in the methods necessary to prove something legally to say yes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it really depends on what "logistics" means but if identification is costless then yes, absolutely yes
-
consider, right now the recipients of diseases are faced with strict liability in the form of having to suffer the disease
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Are we really pondering whether it would be a good idea to involve lawyers in what would, by the nature of life, amount to every facet of human interaction? You sneeze and panic because Karen might now have grounds to sue you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.