one thing I think people dont consider enough when looking at eg the ability of the Taliban to resist US force, or the Viet Cong, or whatever, in the context of the value of small arms is that the US did not adopt the tactic of "kill everyone until the fighting stops"
-
-
Serious question: why did you take yours? If I wanted to argue for the relevance of small arms today, which I've done... At least one or two times, my tack would certainly not be "well we didn't try to annihilate the Vietnamese". That was McNamara's explicit doctrine!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.