would you call yourself sex positive
-
-
-
Replying to @GracchiSimp @eigenrobot
i'll need to gather more data before being sure, but
HOT TAKE
: kids these days aren't having enough sex3 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @GracchiSimp @eigenrobot
i remember when the HPV vaccine first came out when I was like 20, thinking "oh boy, it's game on for tomorrow's kids!" i'm very disappointed in all of you.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @GracchiSimp @eigenrobot
what if every element of safety that gets applied to sex makes it less appealing
4 replies 3 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @chaosprime @eigenrobot
then we'd be in a universe that isn't the one we're living in
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @chaosprime @eigenrobot
if you're into it then there are plenty of ways to artificially increase the risks of sex
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @eigenrobot @chaosprime
even after carefully looking up what apollonian means, i don't understand what you're saying here
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
apollonian contrasted with dionysian sex is basically a pure expression of the dionysian
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot @chaosprime
and you're saying that a conscious effort to increase the risk is anti-dionysian, and thus anti-sex? but it's no different from the conscious effort put into satisfying any other sort of kink and besides, Freud got essentially nothing right about anything
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GracchiSimp @eigenrobot
i guess Paglia also got nothing right
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.