what if arguing for crazy things in politics will beat arguing for "not crazy things" in politics nine times out of ten and if you want to have not crazy things you need to package them in a compelling narrative that people can use to undergird their personal life narratives
-
Show this thread
-
"im a visionary, and im for nuking the moon to solve social security via worldwide EMPs" vs "im for not nuking the moon what the hell that doesnt make any sense" vs "im not for nuking the moon because since we were children she has lit our way in the darkness"
10 replies 4 retweets 93 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @eigenrobot
"I'm not for nuking the moon because c'mon, eclipses are f-ing *rad*."
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.