what if arguing for crazy things in politics will beat arguing for "not crazy things" in politics nine times out of ten and if you want to have not crazy things you need to package them in a compelling narrative that people can use to undergird their personal life narratives
-
-
i mean it just /is/ you know i think the problems when you pretend its not like this and end up losing to crazy ideas
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
"I'm not for nuking the moon because c'mon, eclipses are f-ing *rad*."
-
perfect!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is why you make coalitions with crazy and then sneak through your stuff. This right here.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Quality of idea entirely superseded by quality of narrative?pic.twitter.com/fcp7dD6MTH
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This makes sense, stories resonate on an emotional level
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is literally why the
@TheBabylonBee works.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Last one seems pretty reasonable imo
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.