-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Anarchy is inherently anti-ethical, so yes. Any time u preclude someone from a moral argument based on identity or "experience", ethics and society become impossible.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
shhhh
End of conversation
-
-
-
People who don't own uteruses shouldn't be able legislate on their use. It's basic logic. Just the same way that people who don't own sla
-
People who don't own guns shouldn-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Why do you focus on this aspect, rather than how to make men's vote on women's issues not be so fucking outsized?
-
well I dont understand this as written but if its object level politics its because im not so interested in that and dont care how it shakes out
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Don't own land? Then what gives you the right to make laws about landlords? Or, I'm sorry, People Of Property POPs shouldn't be controlled in what they can do by those without the same lived experience Landlord Liberation is only possible after dismantling non-POP privilege
-
This one is good. There are some who think we should go back to when the only people who could vote are land owners. I'm not opposed to this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.