"reifying trauma erodes agency"
im starting to think that is a scissor statement
-
-
I think it *can*. I'm not sure that it *had to*- I started to say it *doesn't* but maybe it only has to *a little* and I think doing it *just* a little is actually fine, so that doesn't *feel* like doing it at all?
-
I think being more specific may help. Currently we have this vision of trauma as this kind of mystic gunk that builds up when you get hurt and hurts you more. If we actually had an anatomic model... an accurate picture... would that be better or worse for this?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.