this would probably be really bad even proposing it is really bad also given recent judicial nomination politics history my bet is it fails, republicans get a full sweep in 2024, and then they successfully expand it using this attempt as precedenthttps://twitter.com/theintercept/status/1382472663222878209 …
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
Curious, why is this not a slippery slope fallacy?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @krishnanrohit
its just a slippery slope wheres the fallacy?
1 reply 0 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @eigenrobot
It's not fait accompli that one action of changing supreme court leads to a sweep leads to another series of changes. Hasn't happened in the past - not obv the slope is as slippery. Hence fallacy. or, "We shouldn't do [Good Thing X] because later we'll have [Bad Thing Y]"
8 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @krishnanrohit
@RemindMe_OfThis on January 1, 2030
2:53 AM - 15 Apr 2021
0 replies
0 retweets
20 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.