apparently they are arguing about whether they can admit the possibility of submerged cities this leads me to a new rare opinion that civilization is older than we know, the first ancient cities were coastal and simply lie beneath the waveshttps://twitter.com/ded_ruckus/status/1380257857371660291 …
-
Show this thread
-
if archaeologists simply refuse to investigate underwater cities this gets much more likely consider: (1) coastal locations are advantageous. auspicious for a city (2) sea levels have risen by 100m since 10000 BC do the mathpic.twitter.com/0nlE6nZlgh
7 replies 12 retweets 208 likesShow this thread -
the archaeology of ancient sea-devoured evidence is fascinating stuff also FYI if your not aware the Pacific Northwest is probably going to be destroyed in the next couple hundred years could go off anytime too https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/07/20/the-really-big-one …pic.twitter.com/2QwFa9xywq
11 replies 3 retweets 144 likesShow this thread -
looking at this figure its actually very strange that the curve just levels out around 6000BC quite striking what was going on there also curious why sea levels have not changed in spite of climate so and so what the hell determines sea level. is it not just sea vs glacier?pic.twitter.com/esn31soozv
10 replies 4 retweets 118 likesShow this thread -
eigenrobot Retweeted Sirsfurther
oh right. hmmm. black sea isn't THAT voluminous is it?https://twitter.com/sirsfurther/status/1380426658453291009?s=19 …
eigenrobot added,
4 replies 0 retweets 64 likesShow this thread -
hmm doesnt seem like enough. surface area of the earth is 196.9 million mi^2
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
Oh right lol, I just meant it was a place where there'd be a ton of underwater cities
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.