I genuinely believe this is something of a misunderstanding for the most part as far as I have been able to tell working in a variety of positions in these firm's these firms basically just want to make money. and it is best to interpret their behavior through this lens https://twitter.com/EnlightenedXi/status/1368513438939570177 …
-
-
yes but the mechanism for dealing with it is quite different depending on your beliefs about the threat model of these firms i suggest further /insulating/ them from the effects of public opinion and regulators would probably be helpful https://twitter.com/NovusIacobus/status/1368515530890575872?s=19 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
$100 says they're more afraid of their own employees than of regulators
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is my experience at a Local Employer of Note. They view regulatory action correctly as a tail risk with unlimited downside. So it makes to spend or forgo profit in rather significant amounts to neutralize as much of the risk as possible
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Adverse regulatory actions" are the way the governments have found to externalize their action
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.