ssc vs new york times is a battle of different epistemologies, criticising one for not following the epistemology of the other misses the point
-
-
hmm, in that nyt sees discourse as a battle between groups whereas ssc sees it as an attempt to find the truth
-
probably NYT just needs to be linked to the Scott's thing on Conflict V Mistake. Or Scott does. I don't know
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.