so heres the beauty of layering whatever you believe under eighty layers of obfuscation and Ingroup cant if your transparent you can be crucified for it however if no one has any idea what your talking about and they can only cite your object level shit they have two choices
-
-
4chan did a different thing where they licked normal things which turned them into bad things. like the ok hand or pepe or w/e and it worked because in fact people are insane and are happy to beclown themselves ig so I guess that is a risk with the second attack angle
Show this thread -
even so this is always a risk if you have a place where people have odd ideas. and I think it is an improvement over baseline of just . . . tweeting it out i understand this is apocryphal but the spirit of it is correct. especially so in a hostile information ecosystempic.twitter.com/pgakECHaBv
Show this thread -
even if no one is especially sure what is actually being discussed. or why exactly. the mere fact that people are doing something other than talking about the same shit in the same way is wonderful, and worth preserving
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
total tangent but why does Estonia get mentioned randomly all the time? it's the perfect obscure-but-known country? (more specifically how'd you think of it for this tweet?)
-
its got the cutest baltic countryball imo seems like a tiny inoffensive country
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.