wilkinson trying to get through an explanation of neocameralism bob ties it back to larry summers darkly humorous
-
Show this thread
-
pausing at 43:45 to watch some anime ill continue in a bit
5 replies 1 retweet 34 likesShow this thread -
ww: "we have to enforce norms about what its ok to say in public"pic.twitter.com/qE3KiFD4jc
4 replies 1 retweet 76 likesShow this thread -
bob: "maybe rationalists are constitutively against reading the room" i think thats right and i think its beautiful
4 replies 4 retweets 105 likesShow this thread -
ww: "and thats a slippery slope from liberal toleration of an unfettered marketplace of ideas to . . . right wing shit stirring" sir. shit stirring has no party
3 replies 2 retweets 55 likesShow this thread -
ww now seems to be arguing that shit stirrers are MAKING the left be censorious and oppressive stop making me hit you etc
2 replies 3 retweets 68 likesShow this thread -
ww: "this dude wanted to write a story. no ill will. [ . . . ] ok it seems no one actually knows what the rules are. [ . . . ] and scott just flips is fucking wig and kills his blog. and some of them try to cancel cade metz!!!!" can you imagine the gall
3 replies 1 retweet 39 likesShow this thread -
im sorry will. were just enforcing discourse norms
1 reply 0 retweets 51 likesShow this thread -
ww: "cade metz was just doing his job"
5 replies 0 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @eigenrobot
Is there any actual defense of the article or is it all a meta defense
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.