i was totally going to write today, but (a) the ongoing bitcoin meltdown (ahahaha) in my mentions, and then (b) the NYT SlateStarCodex article *finally* dropped i worked surprisingly hard on (b), i can tell you a lot of what i said made it in, even if not directly linked
-
Show this thread
-
and yes rationalists, i supplied full links. if you don't understand how NYT fact-checking works, it's cynical centrist editors who don't believe anything you can't prove right there. if you don't assume every phrase is multiply backed up, you are simply incorrect.
4 replies 2 retweets 4 likesShow this thread
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.