so this seems to be a story that is consolidating. and robinhood didnt come out and say this because . . . it makes them look worse to investors maybe? not retail investors but people who would actually buy them? some other reason? i am not in the weeds enough here to knowhttps://twitter.com/JamesSurowiecki/status/1355035563368321027 …
-
-
ok but im not toooootally sure about this for the following reason (which may simply reflect a further degree of ignorance on my part) this explains why they would stop new buys but not necessarily why they would actively sell existing positions . . . I think? can imagine things
Show this thread -
overall this is a really fast moving and low information situation and while there are reasons to believe its a conspiracy i think some of those reasons are unrelated to whether it was a conspiracy
Show this thread -
Show this thread
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
WeBull did, they didnt.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Panic, probably. Fog of war?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Few people want to admit scaling problems.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean, nothing to cause a bank run like the bank saying "we don't have any money"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Why didn’t you just say you couldn’t afford it?” is a cultural question and an extremely deep and interesting one. (I don’t mean necessarily ethnic cultures here though it’s fascinating in that context too)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.