its transparent that a radically libertarian response to the virus would have solved this problem in the span of three months
-
-
Or we run out of hospital capacity and the case fatality rate skyrockets as medium-severity cases go untreated due to resource constraints on the health system, killing far far more than just those in nursing homes.
-
So I think the outcome of radical libertarianism is that people would make city-states which would have enacted their own quarantines in January, where people have exit rights.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
people are quite bad at assessing their own risk (it's just the flu bro! you're fine unless you're old or sick bro!), as well as the risk they pose to others a real libertarian solution would have involved some way to deter violence like a tort regime or insurance market
-
Mcdonalds snipers taking out everybody without a mask in behalf of Coca-Cola's road division
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Then comes the vigilante response against those who helped kill our parents and grandparents.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, that would ALSO radically disburden the social funds that they are vehemently opposed to and would have abolished or never introduced in the first place depending on when on your specific fantasy timeline they assumed control
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And hey, that happened anyway with the homes having to take back infected patients
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.