here is a long thread about how the federal government can end run the Constitution in just about any way you like bringing this up For No Particular Reasonhttps://twitter.com/eigenrobot/status/1276663566427283456 …
-
Show this thread
-
I didn't touch on Operation Chokepoint here but I should have and I imagine that specific approach will continue in salience
1 reply 0 retweets 38 likesShow this thread -
similarly, licensing regimes where (i) a license is required by the government, and (ii) licensing is handled by private entitieshttps://www.reason.com/volokh/2021/01/08/new-ban-on-harassing-speech-or-hate-speech-anywhere-any-time-by-national-association-of-realtors/%3famp …
1 reply 1 retweet 39 likesShow this thread -
in many ways I see our country becoming less "free" in some broad sense. i am not sure of the extent to which this is a reversion to some tacit historical norms--you could hardly call the Puritans "free" on many important dimensions--rather than a lurch in a novel direction.
3 replies 2 retweets 43 likesShow this thread -
i may actually write an essay about this and post it somewhere once I've digested this further. i think this trend is often noted or intuited but rarely analyzed. in advance of that, one thread that weighs heavily on me is the role of norms in governing freedom
4 replies 0 retweets 43 likesShow this thread -
lots of the norms that existed for the majority of the 20C were thrashed by new behavioral modes enabled by the internet. the tabooing of pornography is one; I suspect there were many others, less obvious.
2 replies 1 retweet 43 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @eigenrobot
and yeah, a lot of these norms were bullshit and we're well shut of them, but "norms don't deserve special regard" itself became a norm, a sort of Norm Zero.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
