What's funny is that it would have been way more fair if they actually used machine learning
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Stanford's the only one who's been caught
-
yeah :/
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What are we supposed to start testing out code now? Next thing you know we’ll have to start getting all our code reviewed by others. Sheesh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
mfw people fundamentally do not understand that ML is just non-parametric statistics plus compute, and you can't use ML to learn cases where there isn't enough data for structure to be inferred. :( What would an ML model even *mean* in this situation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I figure that public health is alot like certain areas of banking. You have to be able to tell regulators why the model made the decision it made. Decision Trees are good for this.
-
You just can't give them the weights of a NN and say that's the model.

End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
