i bet i review more experiments in month than most academics do in in a year
-
-
not that I'm disagreeing with your bigger point but this isn't strong evidence for it anyone can see there's underpublication of null results, but most interesting results are significant anyway and academic publishing's job kinda of is enforcing this sort of bimodality
-
be a shame if tenure incentives led to publication bias and p-hacking led to entire fields being discredited
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.