Sometimes in insular communities--maybe a niche interest group, maybe a church, maybe a small town--you'll hear about what a blogger from the Before Time called a Missing Stair. http://pervocracy.blogspot.com/2012/06/missing-stair.html …
-
Show this thread
-
Missing Stairs are people who are very bad for a community for some reason or another. Maybe they're a rapist or a child molester; maybe they're intolerable; maybe they're just an asshole.
1 reply 0 retweets 32 likesShow this thread -
What's interesting is that the communities don't /do/ anything about these people; they just sort of know they're around and route around them, in spite of knowing (or suspecting, in their heart of hearts) that the person is a walking Issue.
3 replies 0 retweets 36 likesShow this thread -
At this point your hackles may be raised, because the idea of identifying a person as Problematic seems grossly unfair and perhaps you yourself have been targeted by such claims, or even banished. Hold onto that thought for a moment.
1 reply 0 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
Excluding people sucks hard, and with some exceptions people don't like to do it. It's painful, and it tears at the community. But if you acknowledge that perhaps yes there is a Problem, well--you almost have to, don't you? If it becomes common knowledge Action is obliged.
4 replies 0 retweets 28 likesShow this thread -
So the easiest thing to do is simply Not See it as hard as you can. This is tempting in any situation, and perhaps overwhelmingly so if the cost of solving the Problem is very high. What if you lose your job? Your career? So maybe you get people like Weinstein.
4 replies 0 retweets 40 likesShow this thread -
anyway, something to think about as you watch your reaction the next time you hear someone whisper the words "electoral fraud"pic.twitter.com/9ES1FnE4Ts
13 replies 2 retweets 45 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @eigenrobot
this is almost precisely equivalent to using the missing stair argument to justify "believe all women"
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AlexGodofsky @eigenrobot
the methods being used to "detect" fraud (or smoke, in the analogy) are at least as useless as the methods used to figure out which foods give you cancer sometimes much more useless, like regressing A against A + B / 2
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AlexGodofsky @eigenrobot
and it's also clear that no fraud is going to make the difference necessary to flip the outcome
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
look it in the eyes bad things exist
-
-
Replying to @eigenrobot
you need to flip multiple states by tens of thousands of votes, and you need to not have any countervailing fraud
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.