this was an interesting line of thought yesterday its strictly true but also not in a broader sense ie i dont see any positive discussion of family outside of trad discourse very easy for left or center to present an alternative vision in theory no? https://twitter.com/default_friend/status/1320606998770053123 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this isn't a runaway effect, family abolitionism has been a leftist thing for decades, especially in the insano academic circles that have now taken over the discourse mills
-
iow i think the right-clustering is because the really insane leftists now have the power to eject ppl with a family preference from their ingroup rather than the other way around
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The more worrisome model, which has some empirical support, is that having a family retreats from being a plausible aspiration for most of society to a class marker for top 20% or so. Unlike most class markers, presence/absence directly perpetuates, in most literal way possible.
-
i worry about this a lot
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Simple, maybe, but I don't think it's entirely wrong. Even if it's clouded by the recent "trad" trend (both for and opposition), I think this analysis still ultimately has some truth to it and applies to more than just behavior revolving around families. As odd as it is. . . 1)
-
You see this in the furry fandom. It always had a higher amount of gay/bi people in it, even when that was a minority view in broader society. Over time, it has trended overwhelmingly far-left (and more gay/bi) and those who are otherwise are castigated--for being outgroup. 2)
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
